ViBe://RESULTS

What savings look like, by business type.

These are illustrative models — not client case studies. Each example uses realistic inputs for its industry and shows the type of problem we solve, the replacement we design, and the modeled annual savings.

// ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLES — NOT REAL CLIENTS

Professional Services

Mid-size accounting and advisory firm, 45 staff

ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE

The Problem

The firm was paying for six separate SaaS subscriptions to manage client intake, document collection, project tracking, billing, reporting, and internal communications. Each system required a different login, different training, and manual data transfer between them. Two junior staff spent roughly 30% of their time on data entry that existed solely because the tools did not talk to each other.

Existing Stack

  • Client intake: Typeform + Zapier
  • Document management: Google Drive + DocuSign
  • Project tracking: Monday.com
  • Billing: FreshBooks
  • Reporting: Google Looker Studio (manual exports)
  • Internal comms: Slack

Proposed Replacement

Single custom platform covering intake, document collection, project status, billing triggers, and automated reporting. Slack retained for internal communication.

Automated Workflows

  • Client intake form auto-creates project record and onboarding checklist
  • Document requests sent automatically at each project milestone
  • Invoice generated and sent when project milestone is marked complete
  • Weekly status reports generated and emailed to clients without staff involvement

Modeled Annual Savings

Software spend removed

$42,000

Labor capacity recovered

$38,000

Hiring avoidance

$65,000

Modeled annual total

$145,000

// illustrative estimate

Distribution

Regional industrial parts distributor, 90 employees

ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE

The Problem

Order management, inventory tracking, vendor communications, and customer quote generation lived in four different systems. Sales reps spent two hours per day copying data between the ERP and a CRM that was never fully adopted. Customer quotes took 24–48 hours because pricing data had to be manually checked against vendor portals.

Existing Stack

  • ERP: NetSuite (underutilized)
  • CRM: Salesforce (partially adopted)
  • Vendor portal access: manual logins to 12 vendor sites
  • Quote generation: Excel templates emailed as PDFs
  • Inventory alerts: manual spreadsheet review

Proposed Replacement

Custom order and quote management layer that pulls live pricing from vendor APIs, generates quotes in under 60 seconds, syncs orders to NetSuite automatically, and flags inventory thresholds without human review.

Automated Workflows

  • Live vendor pricing pulled via API — no manual portal logins
  • Quote generation automated from product selection to PDF delivery
  • Low-inventory alerts sent to purchasing team automatically
  • Order confirmation and tracking updates sent to customers without staff action

Modeled Annual Savings

Software spend removed

$58,000

Labor capacity recovered

$94,000

Hiring avoidance

$72,000

Modeled annual total

$224,000

// illustrative estimate

Healthcare

Multi-location specialty medical practice, 60 staff

ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE

The Problem

Patient scheduling, intake forms, insurance verification, billing, and appointment reminders were handled by a combination of a legacy PM system, a fax machine workflow, manual phone follow-ups, and a billing service charging 8% of collections. Front desk staff spent three hours per day on reminder calls alone.

Existing Stack

  • Practice management: legacy on-premise system
  • Intake: paper forms scanned to PDF
  • Insurance verification: manual portal checks by billing staff
  • Appointment reminders: staff phone calls and a generic SMS service
  • Billing: third-party billing service at 8% of collections

Proposed Replacement

Modern patient portal with online intake, automated insurance verification via API, SMS + email reminder sequences, and in-house billing workflow with exception-only human review.

Automated Workflows

  • New patient intake completed online before the appointment — no paper
  • Insurance eligibility verified automatically at booking, flagged for staff only when denied
  • Reminder sequence runs 48hr, 24hr, and 2hr before each appointment — no staff calls
  • Billing workflow auto-codes standard visits and routes exceptions to billing staff

Modeled Annual Savings

Software spend removed

$28,000

Labor capacity recovered

$72,000

Hiring avoidance

$85,000

Modeled annual total

$185,000

// illustrative estimate

// All examples are illustrative models based on typical inputs for this business type. They do not represent actual clients, actual projects, or guaranteed results. Realized savings depend on implementation scope, workflow adoption, vendor pricing at time of cancellation, and other factors specific to each engagement. These figures are provided for planning purposes only and should not be treated as financial projections.

ViBe://MEASURE

Where the savings come from.

Every engagement targets the same three categories. The mix varies by industry — but all three are always on the table.

Software spend

$15K–$80K

avg annual removal per engagement

Labor capacity

25–35%

of repetitive hours recovered

Hiring avoidance

1–3 roles

no longer needed after automation

// These ranges are modeled estimates based on illustrative business scenarios. Actual results vary by engagement. Not a guarantee of savings.